Arbitrary... Capricious... Discriminatory

Text Box: 30 Years After 
Gregg v. Georgia

Grassroots Organizing Kit
Arbitrary... Capricious... DiscriminatoryArbitrary... Capricious... DiscriminatoryArbitrary... Capricious... DiscriminatoryArbitrary... Capricious... Discriminatory


 

“From this day forward, I no longer shall tinker with the machinery of death.  For more than 20 years I have endeavored ... along with the majority of this Court, to develop procedural and substantive rules that would lend more than the mere appearance of fairness to the death penalty endeavor.  Rather than continue to coddle the Court’s delusion that the desired level of fairness has been achieved ... I feel morally and intellectually obligated to concede that the death penalty experiment has failed.”

 

--U.S. Supreme Court Justice Harry Blackmun, 1994

 

May 2006

 

Dear Friends,

 

In 1972, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down existing death penalty statutes. In Furman v. Georgia, the Court ruled that the death penalty, as applied then, was arbitrary, capricious and discriminatory – as random as being struck by lightning.  It commuted the sentences of all 629 people on death row, sending states scrambling to revise their capital punishment statutes.

 

Four years later, on July 2, 1976, the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Gregg v. Georgia upheld some of the newly crafted death penalty statutes and took the position that the death penalty did not offend “the evolving standards of decency which mark the progress of a maturing society.”  Gregg essentially held that a properly written statute could guide the discretion used to make death penalty decisions. By the time the court ruled, death rows had already begun to fill up. Executions resumed in 1977; by the end of 2005, more than 1,000 people had been executed.

 

The 30th anniversary of the Gregg decision provides an excellent opportunity for grassroots activists to call for a thorough and frank assessment of whether the expectations of a fairer and less arbitrary death penalty have, in fact, been fulfilled.  Today, given the growing body of research and scientific developments related to the death penalty, society should be asking these important questions:

 

·       Is today’s death penalty any fairer or less arbitrary than it was in 1972?

 

·       Is the death penalty truly reserved for “the worst of the worst”?

 

·       Do race, geography, and the quality of representation make the real difference in capital cases?

 

·       Why are so many death penalty cases found to be fraught with error requiring costly re-trials and uncertainty?

 

·       Why have innocent people been wrongly accused and sentenced to die?

 

·       Is the money we are investing in the death penalty taking away valuable resources from programs that could prevent crime?

 

·       Why have numerous faith leaders and public officials called for an end to the death penalty?

 

As the 30th anniversary of Gregg v. Georgia approaches, groups that work on the death penalty should provide guidance on these and other important questions so that the public has the opportunity to reflect honestly on the death penalty’s track record over the past three decades. Groups should also encourage state and national lawmakers to examine the death penalty and halt all executions while they conduct such studies.

 

We encourage you to use these materials as you prepare to mark the 30th anniversary of Gregg.   This kit contains the following resources:

 

·       Key messages and talking points about the Gregg decision

·       A sample letter to the editor

·       A sample press release

·       Fact sheet on 30 years of the “modern” death penalty

·       Major milestones in the U.S. death penalty since the Gregg decision

·       Ideas for local action

·       Information relating to the Annual Starvin’ for Justice Fast & Vigil at the U.S. Supreme Court

·       A letter from Sister Helen Prejean regarding the “Dead Man Walking” Album and Concert DVD

·       Step-by-step instructions on how to pass an abolition or moratorium resolution, plus a model resolution

·       A sample bulletin insert for faith communities

·       Supplementary resources for action

 

A study guide on the Gregg decision and its aftermath, produced for Amnesty International USA by Professor Michael L. Radelet, accompanies this organizing kit.  It is also available online at http://www.amnestyusa.org/abolish/gregg.

 

We hope that you find this organizing kit useful and that our combined acts of solidarity marking this anniversary attract significant attention and action from both the public and elected officials.  Thirty years since Gregg, the death penalty is still arbitrary, still capricious, and still discriminatory. This is the moment to evaluate whether we have truly evolved as a society.  We thank you for raising this important question in your respective communities.

 

In Solidarity,

The Gregg30 Working Group

 

Members

Abolitionist Action Committee

Amnesty International USA (AIUSA)

Campaign to End the Death Penalty

Citizens United for Alternatives to the Death Penalty (CUADP)

Equal Justice USA

National Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty (NCADP)


“Revisiting the Death Penalty: 30 Years after Gregg

Messages and Talking Points

 

 

The death penalty today remains arbitrary:

 

 

 

Ø     Hamilton County, Ohio, which contains Cincinnati, had 50 people on death row, while Franklin County, which contains Columbus, had only 11 people on death row, despite having a larger population and twice the murder rate.

Ø     Baldwin County, Georgia had a population of 42,000, and 5 people on death row.  This was more death row inmates than Fulton County, which had a population of 722,400.

Ø     Harris County, Texas (Houston) had 140 death row inmates.  Dallas County, with a higher murder rate, had only 37 death row inmates.

 

 

·       Despite the claim that the death penalty is reserved for the “worst of the worst,” history clearly demonstrates that this is simply not true. In recent years, both the BTK serial killer in Kansas and Gary Ridgeway, the Washington state man who confessed to committing 48 murders over a 20-year period, received life sentences for their crimes.

 

·       Approximately two percent of those convicted of crimes that make them eligible for the death penalty actually receive a death sentence, and far less than one percent are then executed.

 

 

The death penalty today remains discriminatory:

 

 


The 30th anniversary of Gregg v. Georgia comes at a time when Americans are becoming increasingly skeptical about the death penalty. Recent data indicates that a growing segment of the public does not think the death penalty is working and believes it is time to step back and reexamine capital punishment:

 

 

 

 

A growing number of new voices are challenging the death penalty in this country because it is costly, inaccurate, and unfair. Gregg v. Georgia did not address the emerging problems of costs, the frequency of human error, the divergent views of victims, or the impact that carrying out executions has on everyone who plays a role:

 

·       The American Bar Association has called for a national moratorium on all executions because the system is so seriously flawed.

 

·       Many organizations of victims’ family members, such as Murder Victims’ Families for Human Rights, have rejected the death penalty as part of the healing process. Individuals such as Bud Welch, whose daughter was killed in the Oklahoma City Bombing, have stated that it does nothing to ease their pain and there is no such thing as “closure” after an execution. The billions of dollars spent on the death penalty over the last 30 years could have been better invested in programs that assist victims’ family members and help to prevent crimes in the first place.

 

·       Leaders from nearly every religious denomination in the country have called for a halt to executions because the death penalty remains seriously flawed. The Catholic Church has embarked on a national campaign to end the death penalty, and other denominations are increasing their efforts as well.

 

 

The United States today is increasingly isolated in its use of the death penalty:

 

 

·       The United States continues to be one of the top executing nations in the world and is out of step with the majority of its global allies on this issue (Canada, Mexico, France, Germany, United Kingdom, Australia, and Italy have all abolished the death penalty; Russia has had a de facto moratorium since 1999).

 

 

 

 


Sample Letter to the Editor

 

 

Letters to the Editor should be submitted based on the newspaper’s guidelines. Generally, these guidelines can be found on the newspaper’s website.  Regular submissions should be limited to between 200-250 words.  They will only use your contact information to verify the author of the letter.  It will not be published in the newspaper. 

 

The following template will provide you with language that might be useful in preparing your own letters.  Consider sending a letter in the week leading up to the July 2 anniversary.  We encourage you to personalize your letters and to adapt the key messages, talking points, and facts to the specific situation in your state.

 

***

Gregg at 30: Still Arbitrary, Still Capricious

 

On July 2, 1976, the U.S. Supreme Court, in a 5-to-4 ruling in Gregg v. Georgia, decided that executions could resume after a more than 10-year break.  Yet today the death penalty still remains arbitrary, capricious and discriminatory. At least 123 people have been freed from death rows across the country after evidence of their innocence emerged. The exorbitant cost of the death penalty hungrily consumes our tax dollars and has even bankrupted some counties. More and more Americans are turning away from capital punishment, including religious leaders, murder victims’ family members, law enforcement officers, and leading conservatives.

 

And the U.S. finds itself increasingly isolated when it comes to this peculiar phenomenon: Since the Gregg decision was handed down 30 years ago, 70 countries have abolished capital punishment. The question for us to ponder today is not whether but when we will join them.

 

Sincerely,

 

<Name>

<Affiliation>

<Address>

<City, State, Zip>

<Contact Number>

 

 

 


Sample Press Release

 

 

(Local Letterhead) 

 


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE                                                                          CONTACT: INSERT NAME

DAY, MONTH, DATE, YEAR                                                                                  TELEPHONE, EMAIL

                  

SKEPTICISM ABOUT THE DEATH PENALTY GROWS AS

30th ANNIVERSARY OF GREGG V. GEORGIA DECISION APPROACHES

 

Growing Concerns About Arbitrariness and Accuracy Lead to

 Declining Public Support for Capital Punishment

 

TOWN, STATE – As the 30th anniversary of the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Gregg v. Georgia approaches, members of INSERT ORGANIZATION NAME note that concerns about the fairness and accuracy of the death penalty continue to linger decades after the Justices ruled to uphold newly crafted state death penalty statutes.  The group notes that a close examination of the death penalty around the country reveals that it remains as ineffective and arbitrary as it was when the U.S. Supreme Court declared it unconstitutional in 1972, a fact that underscores the need to repeal the death penalty or halt executions in INSERT STATE.

 

“Public support for the death penalty is at its lowest point in 27 years, death sentences have declined by more than 50% since the late 1990’s, and executions in the U.S. are down by 40% since 1999, ” said INSERT NAME, INSERT TITLE of the INSERT ORGANIZATION NAME. “The trend is clear. People are turning away from the death penalty because it has proven to be costly, ineffective, and unfair. The 30th anniversary of Gregg v. Georgia is the perfect opportunity for our state lawmakers to listen to the public’s concerns and reevaluate capital punishment in INSERT STATE.”

 

            INSERT ORGANIZATION NAME notes that the practice of the death penalty has also become more isolated in the U.S., a fact that calls attention to the arbitrary nature of the capital punishment. Nearly half of the executions that have taken place in the U.S. have occurred in two states, Texas and Virginia. The South carries out 80% of all executions, and most states with the death penalty have had no executions in recent years. In addition, more than 80% of those executed in the U.S. were sentenced to death for crimes that involved white victims, despite the fact that nationally 50% of murder victims are white.

 

            “The arbitrary nature of capital punishment is not only evident in the number of states carrying out executions and in a closer examination of the race of the victims in these cases, but studies across the country have revealed that within death penalty states who lives and who dies depends more on where a capital crime is committed than on the specifics of the case,” stated INSERT NAME, INSERT TITLE of the INSERT ORGANIZATION.       

 

             In addition to the unfairness of capital punishment, ORGANIZATION NAME members have also voiced concerns about the issue of innocence. Since 1973, 123 innocent people have been freed from death row, including INSERT NUMBER in HOME STATE. In recent years, ORGANZATION NAME has urged state lawmakers to take steps to avoid future mistakes by INSERT LOCAL STATE ACTION SUPPORTED. (This paragraph should be used when applicable, and local groups should decide what efforts to highlight, etc.)

 

            Nationally, similar concerns about innocence and other issues have prompted state legislators to halt executions or abandon the death penalty altogether. For example, a moratorium on executions is in place in Illinois and New Jersey, and lawmakers in New York have decided to drop the death penalty after a series of public hearings revealed that capital punishment does not serve any legitimate purpose and may never be able to work accurately and fairly.

 

            “There is a lot that can be learned by examining the death penalty over the past three decades and by reviewing the experiences of other states that are working to address capital punishment concerns. The problems uncovered by legislators in New York, New Jersey, Illinois, and other states are not unique to those jurisdictions. As more and more questions are raised about the death penalty throughout the country, our state should also conduct a careful review of its death penalty laws,” concluded NAME, INSERT TITLE of ORGANIZATION NAME.

 

# # #

 


Fact Sheet: 30 Years of the “Modern” Death Penalty

 

 

Text Box: These statistics are based on the 1,022 executions that have taken place as of May 16, 2006.  Please note that some of these figures will change (for example, the number of lethal injections or the number of executions based on race) as executions continue to occur.   

Figures that will NOT change have been marked with a * and can be used as cited here (for example, the number of women who have been executed or the number of executions by firing squad).  Please check www.deathpenaltyinfo.org for the most up-to-date information.  

Source for all:  Death Penalty Information Center and Amnesty International USA

Since the Gregg decision, there have been…

 

 

 

 

·       The oldest person at the time of execution was John Nixon, who was killed by the State of Mississippi at the age of 77, in 2005.*

 

 

Racial Discrimination and the Death Penalty

 

 

Note: In some cases, there were multiple victims of different races and the above execution statistics reflect this.  This was the case in 18 instances.

 

Inconsistencies of Executions across the USA

Since the U.S. Supreme Court reinstated the death penalty in 1976, 80% of all executions have taken place in the South.  The Northeast accounts for less than 1% of executions. Specific numbers for each state are available on the DPIC and AIUSA websites.

This information is based on 1,022 executions

South (810)

 
.

 

Executions since the Reinstatement of the Death Penalty, by Year

 

Most executions in a single year: 98 in 1999

 

 


Major Milestones in the Death Penalty Since the Gregg Decision

 

June 29: Furman v. Georgia invalidates existing death penalty statutes

 

July 2: Gregg v. Georgia upholds the constitutionality of new death penalty statutes that provide for guided discretion

 

December 7: First lethal injection takes place - Charles Brooks in Texas

 

McCleskey v. Kemp: Racial disparities are not recognized as a constitutional violation of “equal protection of the law” unless intentional racial discrimination against the defendant can be shown

 

Whitmore v. Arkansas makes it impossible in most circumstances for a "next friend" to litigate even winning constitutional issues for an inmate who wishes to waive all appeals, leading to a huge increase in the number of state-assisted suicides of "volunteers", many of whom were seriously mentally ill

 

Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act expands the federal death penalty to over 50 offenses

 

New York becomes the 38th state to adopt the death penalty

 

President Clinton signs the Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act, which greatly curtails the ability of death row inmates whose constitutional rights were violated to secure relief in federal courts

 

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


1996

ABA calls for a moratorium on executions until the death penalty can be administered fairly and impartially in accordance with due process

 

Illinois Governor George Ryan declares a moratorium on executions

 

 

First federal execution takes place in more than 30 years

 

 

Illinois Governor Ryan commutes the sentences of the state’s entire death row population

 

 

Death penalty laws of New York and Kansas declared unconstitutional

 

Moratorium on executions instituted by legislative mandate in New Jersey

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Ideas for Local Action

 

 


Be sure to alert your media contacts as to any activities you are planning to mark this anniversary!

In the days and weeks leading up to the anniversary…

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ø     Amnesty International USA's Death Penalty Blog:  http://blogs.amnestyusa.org/death-penalty

Ø     Abolish the Death Penalty, NCADP: http://www.deathpenaltyusa.blogspot.com/

Ø     Against Death Rows:  www.againstdeathrows.blogspot.com

Ø     Capital Defense Weekly: http://capitaldefenseweekly.com/

Ø     The Lonely Abolitionist:  http://www.lonelyabolitionist.blogspot.com/

Ø     TCASK :: On the Road (to Abolition): http://tcask.blogspot.com/

 

With your own death penalty blog, you can share your thoughts, personal experiences, interesting news stories, or favorite websites; you can also link to other blogs.  There are several websites that offer free blogs, including:

 

Ø     www.blogger.com

Ø     www.typepad.com

Ø     www.blogstream.com

 

 

·       Take action to stop upcoming executions!  Visit http://www.amnestyusa.org/abolish/actions.do or http://www.ncadp.org/execution_alerts.html.

 

On or around July 2…

 

·       Stage Solidarity Actions (rallies, demonstrations, vigils) at your state Supreme Court building, your State Capitol Building, or some other federal or state building.  Invite members of the legal and/or prison community, exonerated death row inmates, murder victims’ family members, and family members of those on death row to speak.  See pages 21-22 for contact information for groups that can help you find a speaker.

 

·       If you are a member of a faith community, place a notice in your bulletin, ask your faith leader to mention the anniversary of the Gregg decision, and/or toll your bells to mark the occasion.  Ask other local churches to toll their bells for two minutes and to let their members know why with a notice in the bulletin and a comment from the pulpit.  This is a great way to introduce communities of faith to the "For Whom the Bells Toll" campaign!  (see http://www.curenational.org/~bells/).  You can also set up an information table and disseminate materials on the death penalty that weekend.  See page 20 for a sample bulletin insert.

 

 

If you can’t come to DC, consider participating in a solidarity fast with the annual Fast & Vigil to Abolish the Death Penalty at the U.S. Supreme Court.  Ask friends and families to join you by donating the amount of money they would spend on food for one day to the abolitionist group of your choice.

 

 

 

Please let us know about your activities!! Go to http://www.amnestyusa.org/abolish/gregg/ to post information about your local events and/or send information to aac@abolition.org.


Starvin’ for Justice ‘06

 

Join the Abolitionist Action Committee for the

13th Annual Fast & Vigil to Abolish the Death Penalty

at the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington, D.C.

June 29 to July 2, 2006

 

 

June 29th — The 34th anniversary of the Furman v. Georgia decision in which the U.S. Supreme Court found the death penalty to be arbitrary and capricious.  More than 600 condemned inmates had their death sentences reduced to life.  All states were required to re-write their death penalty laws.  July 2nd will be the 30th anniversary of the Gregg v. Georgia decision, which allowed the resumption of executions in the U. S.

 

The Abolitionist

        Action

   Committee

 

is an ad-hoc group of individuals committed to highly visible and effective public education for alternatives to the death penalty through non-violent direct action.

 

 

The Annual Fast & Vigil at the U.S. Supreme Court is always June 29 to July 2.  Everyone is encouraged to participate for part or all of this event. Fasting is optional. This is a good opportunity to meet other abolitionists and to re-charge your batteries.  If you can come for the entire fast, please plan to arrive in Washington, DC prior to 7 pm on June 28th and leave after 2am on July 3rd.  For REGISTRATION FORMS, INCLUDING details on lodging, travel and other logistics, to help with funding or to volunteer, please contact the Abolitionist Action Committee c/o CUADP.

 

 

The Abolitionist Action Committee

c/o CUADP:  800-973-6548

PMB 335, 2603 NW 13th St (AKA Dr. MLK Jr. Hwy), Gainesville, FL  32609

    <aac@abolition.org>         <www.abolition.org>


 


“Dead Man Walking” Album and “Dead Man Walking” Concert DVD

A Letter from Sr. Helen Prejean, CSJ

 

 

NOTE:  Along with the fundraising opportunity mentioned below, materials are being prepared to assist activists in using this new DVD as a platform for hosting educational and/or fundraising house parties around the occasion of the 30th Anniversary of the Gregg decision.  Please visit www.CUADP.org or call 800-973-6548 for details AFTER May 22, 2006.

 

***

Dear Friends,

 

We have an exciting opportunity to take advantage of and I want to invite your participation. 

 

The audio soundtrack to the film “Dead Man Walking,” featuring artists like Steve Earle, Tom Waits, Bruce Springsteen, Eddie Vedder, Mary Chapin Carpenter, Suzanne Vega and others, is about to be re-issued by Sony BMG. This CD will be packaged together with a feature-length documentary film on DVD of the “Not In Our Name – Dead Man Walking – The Concert” held at the Shrine Auditorium in Los Angeles in March 1998. This DVD has never before been made available to the public and features extraordinary live performances by Lyle Lovett, Steve Earle, Ani DiFranco, Eddie Vedder, Jeff Ament, Rahat Nusrat Fateh Ali Khan, Dildar Hussain and David Robbins, along with speeches by myself and Tim Robbins.

 

This CD/DVD is currently scheduled to hit stores on June 13.  I am pleased to announce that MVFR and MVFHR will each realize royalties from the sale of this package, which is expected to retail at about $30.00.  The royalties of the first release of the CD generated well over $100,000 for MVFR, so there is a great deal of excitement and potential.

 

There is now an opportunity for the rest of the movement to join in promoting this new release, which will both help generate new royalties for MVFR and MVFHR, and also raise a few dollars for your own organization.  SONY has agreed to a three-week advance sale period during which this product will exclusively be sold through the web pages of groups like your own. Any group can sign up as an affiliate partner and generate sales that help raise funding and awareness. You may be familiar with a similar opportunity that many movement groups took advantage of recently with the sale of the DVD of “The Exonerated.”

 

CUADP is working with ActiveMusic to set up a similarly structured opportunity so that any movement group can add advertisements to their web page to help generate sales of the DMW CD/DVD.  Each sale generated by a participating group will generate at least $5.00 for that group.  No matter who generates the sale, MVFR and MVFHR will benefit in all cases.

 

I am very pleased to see the music industry assist our movement in this way, and I urge your participation. 

 

Yours in the Struggle for Abolition,

 

 

Sr. Helen Prejean, CSJ


Step by Step: How to Get a Resolution Passed

 

Getting Started: Bringing a resolution before your group/community

 

1)   Find out the procedures, if any, by which the group considers a resolution. 

 

2)   Prepare your resolution.  Use the enclosed model resolution or contact us for help on crafting a resolution that addresses how the death penalty is being applied in your state.  Imagine yourself as someone who knows little about the death penalty.  Does your resolution give enough information to lead that person toward supporting a moratorium? 

 

3)   Line up your support.  Share your plans to introduce the resolution with others in your group who you think will support it.  Ask for their help in convincing the group to pass it.

 

4)   Introduce your resolution.  Be sure that everyone involved in the decision has a copy of your resolution.  Make yourself available to answer questions or to provide background information.   

 

5)   Urge an open discussion about your call for a moratorium.  Encourage people to schedule time for internal education on how the death penalty is in fact being used.  Consider showing a video or inviting an outside speaker. 

 

6)   If your resolution is passed: Be sure to alert the media and your national, state, and local elected officials.  Send a copy to Equal Justice USA/Quixote Center for inclusion in the National Tally. 

 

If your resolution does not pass: Don’t get discouraged!  Introducing it has surely educated some people in the group and you have probably made some new allies.  Consult with them about your next steps.

 

What’s Next?  Taking the Campaign to the Next Level

After you’ve gotten your group on board, set out to recruit others!  Here’s how:

 

1)   Alert your entire membership that your resolution has passed.  Ask them to get other groups to do the same.  

 

2)   Put a blank resolution in your next newsletter or email alert.  We can supply you with an electronic version of the resolution or you can point people to www.ejusa.org.  

 

3)   Give a talk at another group, faith community, or school in your area.  Include a pitch for the resolution campaign in your message.  Or when people ask you what they can do, you can give them a blank resolution and ask them to recruit a group.

 

4)   Take a resolution to your city council.  Contact Equal Justice USA for ideas or hints on how to go about gaining your town’s endorsement.  It’s easier than you think!

 

Over 4,300 groups nationwide now endorse a moratorium!  Has yours?

For sample resolutions and more information, see www.ejusa.org or contact us at:

 

Equal Justice USA ¨ PO Box 5206 ¨ Hyattsville, MD 20782-0206 ¨ (301) 699-0042 ¨ ejusa@quixote.org


Model Group Resolution

 

[Please be sure to adapt this information to the situation in your own community.]

 


WHEREAS death sentences are reserved for the poor:

ð     About 90% of all people facing capital charges cannot afford their own attorney.

ð     No state has met standards developed by the American Bar Association (ABA) for appointment, performance, and compensation of counsel for indigent prisoners.

 

Whereas there is ample evidence that the death penalty is applied in a racist manner:              

ð     In 1987, in McCleskey v. Kemp, the U.S. Supreme Court refused to act on data demonstrating the continuing reality of racial bias.

ð     In 1990, the U.S. General Accounting Office reported “a pattern of evidence indicating racial disparities in charging, sentencing and imposition of the death penalty.”

ð     Nationwide, 82% of those put to death had been convicted of murdering a white person, even though people of color are the victims in more than half of all homicides.

ð     The U.S. Congress has failed repeatedly to pass the Racial Justice Act, which would allow prisoners to challenge their death sentences using standards normal in civil racial discrimination cases.

ð     A Justice Department study of federal capital cases from 1995 to 2000 found that 74% of the defendants were people of color.

 

WHEREAS prisoner appeals have been severely curtailed, increasing the risk of imprisonment and execution of innocent people:

ð     In a series of rulings since 1991, the Supreme Court has drastically restricted the rights of death row prisoners to appeal their convictions and death sentences in federal courts, even in cases where prisoners present compelling evidence of innocence.

ð     In 1996, new legislation drastically limited federal court review of death penalty appeals and gutted public funding of legal aid services for death row prisoners.

 

WHEREAS the American Bar Association has concluded that administration of the death penalty is “a haphazard maze of unfair practices with no internal consistency” and has called for a moratorium on executions.

 

WHEREAS repeated polls have found that a majority of Americans support suspending executions entirely until issues of fairness in capital punishment can be resolved.

 

Now, therefore, be it resolved thaT:

_____________________________________________calls on the Governor and our state representatives, President Bush and our representatives in Congress, to enact and adopt legislation imposing a moratorium on executions at least until this state and nation implement policies and procedures which:

ð     Ensure that death penalty cases are administered fairly and impartially in accordance with basic due process.

ð     Eliminate the risk of executing innocent people.

ð     Prevent the execution of mentally disabled persons.

 

Be it further resolved that copies of this resolution shall be forwarded to the Governor, our state representatives, President Bush, and our representatives in Congress.

 

Ratified by

 

(group name)

 

(address)

 

(contact name)

 

(contact phone/email)

Please return ratified copy to:

Equal Justice USA

P.O. Box 5206, Hyattsville, MD  20782

301-699-0042 ¨ [fax] 301-864-2182

ejusa@quixote.org ¨ www.ejusa.org

 



Text Box: This weekend, July 2, marks the 30th anniversary of the landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision, Gregg v. Georgia, which effectively brought the death penalty back to the United States and allowed for the resumption of executions after a more than 10-year break.  When the Supreme Court initially threw out the death penalty in 1972, it ruled that this practice, as applied then, was arbitrary, capricious, and discriminatory – as random as being struck by lightning.  Four years later, however, the Court gave a stamp of approval to newly revised death penalty statutes and took the position that the death penalty did not offend “the evolving standards of decency which mark the progress of a maturing society.”  

The anniversary of Gregg v. Georgia provides us with an opportunity to reexamine the death penalty through the lens of three decades of experience and to decide for ourselves whether this practice offends our own standards of decency.   Please take a few minutes to pray for all people who are impacted by this issue - crime victims and their families, those on death row and their families, lawyers, judges, juries, prison workers, executioners, chaplains, and all those who work on behalf of death row inmates.  More information on the death penalty will be available in Morris Hall after the service.  We encourage all members of this congregation to learn more about the how the death penalty has been applied and carried out in the 30 years since the Gregg decision.  For more information, please contact Social Justice Coordinator Ruth Jackson at 504-879-1276 or rjackson@gmail.com.
Sample Bulletin Insert for Faith Communities

 


Supplemental Resources for Action

 

 

For possible rally speakers, contact the following organizations:

 

Journey of Hope…From Violence to Healing

www.journeyofhope.org, bpelke@gci.net or 1-877-9-24GIVE (4483)

(Murder victims’ families opposed to the death penalty)

 

Murder Victims’ Families for Human Rights

http://www.murdervictimsfamilies.org, rrcushing@earthlink.net, or 617-491-9600

(Murder victims’ families opposed to the death penalty)

 

Murder Victims’ Families for Reconciliation

www.mvfr.org, Robert@mvfr.org, or 512-782-9895

(Murder victims’ families opposed to the death penalty)

 

Witness to Innocence

witnesstoinnocence@gmail.com or 215-243-0505

(Exonerated death row inmates)

 

 

For more information, visit the following websites:

 

The Abolitionist Action Committee
www.abolition.org

 

American Civil Liberties Union

www.aclu.org/deathpenalty/

 

Amnesty International USA
www.amnestyusa.org/abolish

 

Campaign to End the Death Penalty

www.nodeathpenalty.org

 

Citizens United for Alternatives to the Death Penalty

www.cuadp.org

 

The Constitution Project

www.constitutionproject.org

 

Death Penalty Information Center
www.deathpenaltyinfo.org

The Death Penalty: Information for Teachers
teacher.deathpenaltyinfo.msu.edu

 

Equal Justice USA

www.ejusa.org

 

 

NAACP Legal Defense Fund

http://www.naacpldf.org

(For information on death row in your state)

 

National Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty

www.ncadp.org